Skip to main content

Nuclear Weapons free world ??


Towards a nuclear weapons free world


-: In absentia, 
this paper presented in 
National Seminar organized by 
India Development Foundation
3rd June 2012 Gandhi Bhavan Bangalore
moderated by former CJI Justice MN Venkatachalaiah

Some Facts: 

(1) No two functioning democracies have gone to war against each other post advent of NW (Nuclear Weapons).
(2) Among the seven declared NW states, no democracy has acquired weapons in the perceived threat of another democracy. Either totalitarian states have acquired it or democracies have been forced to acquire it because of a clear and present threat from totalitarian states.


History of NW usage:

There have been only two (ghastly enough) instances of NW usage till date. Hiroshima and Nagasaki occurred as a riposte to sustained attack on a democratic society by a totalitarian state and an absence of a forum where the victim democracy could register its grievance. Worse, a non-existent mechanism to punish the offender (for Pearl Harbor) forced it to act the way it did.


Genesis of NW:

The faith of any unit is shaken when it sees that the perpetrators of violence are going unpunished. It then is forced to retaliate with a value-neutral approach.


Substantiation:

Totalitarian states like USSR (1949), China (1964), and Pakistan (1998) went nuclear as a matter of prestige, though they were never attacked. Democracies like USA (July 1945), UK (1952), France (1960), India (1974/98) went nuclear because of proven record of imminent threat by totalitarian states.


States like Ukraine and former Russian federation nations back-stepped from being nuclear to becoming non-nuclear because they are democracies. Undeclared but NW capable states like Australia, South Korea, Israel, South Africa, and Brazil have deliberately chosen a NW free path because they are functioning democracies and are fairly well protected by other democracies in the event of any NW threat. Conversely, the totalitarianism of clandestine NW states like North Korea and Iran is obvious. The proliferation record of totalitarian regimes juxtaposed to democracies is as clear as chalk and cheese.


Conclusion:

NW acquisition and democracy are inseparable factors in the equation to a NW free world. Call for a NW free world and promoting democracy worldwide are two shears of a scissors. Both shears have to pincer in tandem to be effective. On the hypothetical day that the world is freed of all nuclear weapons, one would invariably find that it is rid of totalitarian states and democracies flourishing. A NW free world is but a natural offshoot of thriving democracies. 

The writer is of the firm view that all activists (individuals, institutions, nations, UN, et al) advocating a NW free world should equally support and promote democracies worldwide with the same vigor and fervor as they raise the issue of a world free of NW.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

From A Fragmented Sky ......

 ...... to  The Unified   Masterpiece     There are millions of living species on Earth, all foraging for energy and security. To obtain them, they either live lifelong in one place—like Sweden’s ancient spruce—or undertake great migrations like the salmon. The purpose remains identical: survival through energy and security. Humans are just one species in this tapestry. We are unique, certainly, but like a single dot on a vast circle, we are not inherently superior.      What sets us apart is our UPPF quotient: Upbringing, Psychology, Profession, and Fantasy.     In our formative years, we experience a distinct Upbringing shaped by guardians, stories, religion, and cultural exposure. This leaves a permanent Psychological imprint on our personalities, forming our baseline attachment styles and cognitive maps. Eventually, education steers us toward a Profession—whether by choice or compulsion. This UPP trifecta dictates our everyday b...

ELEGY Sepulchral

मुमुक्षा = Power Decentralization G uardians O f D ecentralization's   E ndless Z eal आदि शंकराचार्य ने हर चैतन्य के 5 चरित्र बताए 1. सत् = न मरने की इच्छा 2. चित् = नया ज्ञान हासिल की इच्छा 3. आनंद = सुख की इच्छा 4. मुमुक्षा = स्वतंत्र होने की इच्छा 5. ऐषणा = दूसरे पर प्र ​ भाव डालने की इच्छा     पहला सत् या जीवन -लंबे समय तक सभी मनुष्यों को प्राप्त नहीं था क्योंकि समाज में मत्स्य न्याय के चलते ताकतवर कमजोरों को मार देते थे, जैसे राक्षस या हिटलर मारते थे । समय के साथ आज अपवादों को छोड दें तो औसत मानवता को सत् मिल गया है, जीवन जीने का हक़ मिल गया है।     दूसरा चित् या ज्ञान भी लंबे समय तक लोगों को उपलब्ध नहीं था, समाज में कुछ ही लोग गुरु होते थे, बाकी सब जानकारी हेतु गुरु पर निर्भर। पहले 15 वीं सदी में प्रिंटिंग प्रेस के चलते और आज सूचना क्रांति के बाद ज्ञान सर्वसुलभ हो गया है, हर किसी के फोन में दुनिया भर का ज्ञान मौजूद है।     तीसरा, आनंद के लिए भौतिक वस्तुओं की, धन की जरूरत होती थी, पर दास प्रथा आदि के चलते बडी आबादी दरिद्र होती थी। 21वीं सदी आते आते...

Cockroach Playbook: Anticipatory Guidance

  Cockroach & Crossbar Task There was intense structural cognitive dissonance captured today in the Cockroach protest. The collective psyche of youth Cockroaches, labeled as a mere parasite, embraces the mascot of absolute survival to resolve  friction. This is not mere political unrest; it is a manifestation of raw psychological resilience of students managing systemic trauma through creative externalization First Principles of Systemic Deceleration & Psychology of Flight      Every systemic crisis leaves a hidden trail of kinetic momentum. When the world stops suddenly, we do not all land in the same place. In fact, some of us are left traveling in mid-air.      A competent driver navigating a sports car down a narrow alley knows his machine can hit 100 mph. He also knows the walls are tight, visibility is low, and stopping safely requires latitude. Therefore, he restrains the engine, moving at a cautious 20 mph. He understands that powe...